Immigration Judge Decisions On Asylum Case, Continuing wide disparities USCIS ordered an indefinite halt to affirmative asylum decisions in November 2025, citing vetting and security concerns. When and how to appeal against a visa, asylum or immigration decision - appeals to the immigration and asylum tribunal, administrative review, fees, forms, further submissions. Supreme Court decisions involving Immigration & National Security and learn about how the Justices have shaped the law in this area. A California immigration judge's lawsuit against the DOJ claims she was abruptly fired during a court hearing, raising questions about political affiliation and asylum decisions. Defensive asylum – Immigration Court: The defensive process is for people who are in deportation or removal proceedings before an If you are eligible for asylum you may be permitted to remain in the United States. It has jurisdiction to review decisions by immigration judges (IJs) and to interpret immigration statutes and regulations. To apply for asylum affirmatively or defensively, file a Form I-589, Application for Asylum and for Hier sollte eine Beschreibung angezeigt werden, diese Seite lässt dies jedoch nicht zu. And of those cases, 76% were denied—also the highest denial rate lexion of Claims Involving Non-state Actors, But Asylum Fundamentals Remain Strong and Intact *** On September 2, 2025, Attorney General Bondi issued two major decisions reinstating agency In 2024–2025, the ECtHR ruled on a number of cases concerning asylum and migration, addressing issues such as pushbacks at land and sea borders, access to asylum procedures, reception Nationwide Comparisons Compared to Judge Naseem's denial rate of 45. The data here only include judges who have issued decisions in at least 100 asylum cases according to Immigration Court records [3]. With nearly 4 million cases pending before immigration courts, a new policy memo is directing judges to take "all appropriate action to Further, in 14 of 19 immigration courts for affirmative cases, and 13 of 19 for defensive cases, applicants were at least 4 times more likely to be granted asylum if their cases were decided by the judge with Even if judges could sustain the completion rate from March, it would take more than 15 years to get through all the pending asylum applications, assuming no new cases enter the system. New policies permit Hier sollte eine Beschreibung angezeigt werden, diese Seite lässt dies jedoch nicht zu. Asylum Decisions (PDF) 10. An immigration judge found Petitioner not credible and denied her If we are unable to approve your asylum application and you are in the United States illegally, we will forward (or refer) your asylum case to an immigration court. asylum decisions, presenting detailed, anonymized data. Keywords immigration law Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant If an immigration judge grants an asylum application, the government’s trial attorney has the right to appeal the decision within 30 days. Wide swings in judicial outcomes for immigration asylum cases nationwide since 2019 are noted in a recent report. Amnesty Cases by Presidential Term (PDF) Asylum 9. Immigration Judge Decisions Overturning Asylum Officer Findings in Credible Fear Cases Published Mar 14, 2023 Over 100,000 credible fear cases have been heard by Immigration The median number of asylum cases decided per judge was 146 – just half the typical asylum cases (278) decided across the entire set of reports including judges who have long served The report is accompanied by TRAC?s annual judge-by-judge reports comparing asylum grant and denial rates for individual judges. S. 9 percent, Immigration Court judges across the country denied 58. Concord immigration judge sues over ouster amid what lawyer describes as purge of federal workers who don’t support Trump Terminations came amid deportation push Judge Profile Access data on immigration judges, including cases, backlogs, grant rates, and removal statistics View Dashboard Critics also say that a board within the courts system that determines how immigration judges can rule on cases has issued a number of decisions under the Trump administration that Information Immigration and asylum chamber: decisions on appeals to the Upper Tribunal A former Bay Area immigration judge is suing the Department of Justice, alleging she was terminated because of her political views and associations. ECAS REMINDER – DHS, attorneys, and fully accredited Explore the crucial role of immigration courts in asylum cases, their decision-making authority, challenges faced, and recent reforms shaping refugee protection. 9 percent of asylum claims during this same The reporters interviewed more than 85 people, including immigration judges, administration officials, asylum seekers and lawyers, and analyzed data on millions of immigration U. That pause affects In Urias-Orellana v. The Justice Department is firing judges at an unprecedented rate while regularly issuing new guidelines to The decision IN THE UPPER TRIBUNAL IMMIGRATION AND ASYLUM CHAMBER Case Nos: UI-2024-004261 First-tier Tribunal No: PA/01189/2023 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS The case largely hinges on what standard of review the justices decide is required for asylum decisions by immigration judges, who are employees of the executive branch. Bondi, the Supreme Court on Monday considered whether federal courts of appeals should make their own This article looks at the pernicious impacts of opacity in asylum decisionmaking in U. Judges Upholding High Number of ‘Exceptional’ Asylum Claims U. McALLEN, Texas (Border Report) — Wide swings in judicial outcomes for immigration asylum cases nationwide since 2019 are noted in a recent report. In Read important U. Hier sollte eine Beschreibung angezeigt werden, diese Seite lässt dies jedoch nicht zu. A referral to an What an Asylum Judge Rating Means for Your Case Navigating the asylum process is complex and often uncertain, especially when the outcome The president has removed 65 immigration judges from their posts and has overseen operational policy changes that have If I am able to have a full "individual" hearing to present my asylum case, what happens at that hearing? Different immigration court outcomes and Immigration Court Asylum Hearings Versus “Review” of Asylum Officers’ Decisions Recent media reports and government documents indicate that the Biden administration may publish an Interim IMMIGRATION AND ASYLUM CHAMBER Case No: UI-2024-000033 First-tier Tribunal No: HU/59325/2023 LH/03986/2023 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Decision & Reasons Issued: On 10 This loss of judges occurred amid a backlog of over three million cases within the immigration court system. Courts have held that an adverse credibility finding in the context of an application for asylum will not necessarily result in a denial of CAT protection, since CAT relief can be based solely on objective Hier sollte eine Beschreibung angezeigt werden, diese Seite lässt dies jedoch nicht zu. This fact sheet provides an overview 8. Meanwhile, judges have raised IMMIGRATION AND ASYLUM CHAMBER Case No: UI-2024-000801 First-tier Tribunal No: HU/52430/2023 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Decision & Reasons Issued: On 20th of December The latest data on asylum decisions in immigration court 1 paints a stark and deeply troubling picture. United States Department of Justice The Immigration Judge (IJ) Dashboard is a CGRS tool for our technical assistance (TA) users that aggregates reports from IJ decisions in asylum, withholding of removal, and Convention Against It also excluded cases in which the immigrant did not appear in court, which nearly always end in a deportation order, and A US immigration judge has denied a bid for asylum from Kilmar Abrego Garcia, whose case has become a proxy for the partisan power struggle The decision foreclosed one of the options that lawyers for Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia had tried in an effort to keep him in the country. The judge in Baltimore on Wednesday denied an application to reopen Abrego el Mukasey certified the case to himself, lifted the stay and remanded the case back to the BIA. Total Asylum Applications (PDF) In Absentia 11. immigration judge has denied a bid for asylum from Kilmar Abrego Garcia. Cases from the First-tier Tribunal are not available to the public. immigration courts and CGRS's newly launched Immigration Judge Dashboard available to advocates. Transactional Records Access Find decisions on appeals against the Home Office heard by the First-tier Tribunal (Asylum Support). Immigration Judges set records in March 2025 with 10,933 asylum decisions and a 76% denial rate. For this reason, understanding how asylum decisions vary across time, across courts, and across judges warrants more attention—particularly in Asylum seekers must navigate a difficult and complex process that can involve multiple government agencies. president has pursued a more aggressive reduction in immigration, pushing for record deportations while curtailing migrant protections. These reports do not cover President Donald Trump’s latest immigration crackdown, prompted by the shooting of two National Guard members, means he has now halted or Decisions of the Upper Tribunal Immigration and Asylum Chamber (opens in a new tab) More court judgements and tribunal decisions (opens in a new tab). 1, in Urias-Orellana v. The BIA then remanded the case to the immigration jud and in December 2009, the judge granted Ms. Look up any immigration judge by name, track case outcomes, court backlogs, asylum decisions, deportation orders, and judge statistics from official Please note that EOIR staff frequently enter and update information into the case database, so the statistics provided are subject to change. By A U. In March 2025, immigration judges decided 10,933 asylum cases—more than in Two-Thirds of Court Asylum Applicants Found Legally Entitled to Remain Published May 17, 2024 The latest Immigrant Court records show that over the past decade (FY 2014 to April 2024) In the past, most immigrants who entered without permission and were later arrested by immigration authorities were typically eligible to ask for Immigration Law: Key Supreme Court Cases The following cases are major Supreme Court cases in the field of immigration law. Additionally, the dashboard contains information on the Information Immigration and asylum chamber: decisions on appeals to the Upper Tribunal In March 2025, immigration judges decided 10,933 asylum cases—more than in any other single month since at least 2001. [1] The latest Why Is Judicial Review Important? Court review provides necessary oversight of government decision-making—review which is essential in immigration cases given that a denied application or a removal On Monday, Dec. Please The CGRS Immigration Judge Dashboard offers unprecedented insight into U. asylum policy, and we assert in these pages that understanding . See how no-show court appearances are trending across immigration courts based on Advocates can access case decision data organized by country of origin, basis of claim, age, and gender. Petitioner applied for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture. Transactional Records Hier sollte eine Beschreibung angezeigt werden, diese Seite lässt dies jedoch nicht zu. Asylum Grant Rates Decline by a Third Published Nov 19, 2024 Asylum seekers are having less and less success at their individual hearings before an Immigration Judge. immigration court records. TRAC is a nonpartisan, nonprofit data research center affiliated with the Newhouse School of Public Communications and the Whitman School of Management, both at Syracuse Explore millions of U. Decisions by the Board are binding unless modified or The CGRS Immigration Judge Dashboard is transforming asylum law transparency in the U. As the composition of cases and the ability of asylum seekers to You can only find decisions about cases from the Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber). The Justice The decision IN THE UPPER TRIBUNAL IMMIGRATION AND ASYLUM CHAMBER Case No: UI-2024-005384 UI-2024-005868 First-tier Tribunal No: PA/00090/2024 THE IMMIGRATION These factors accounted for nearly 60% of total decision variability, meaning that these circumstances — which have nothing to do with the merits All EOIR immigration fees must be submitted by electronic payment through the EOIR Payment Portal. by collecting detailed, anonymous data from real Asylum Outcome Increasingly Depends on Judge Assigned The outcome for asylum seekers has become increasingly dependent upon the In the case where an asylum officer determines that an applicant does not qualify for asylum but does qualify for statutory withholding or CAT relief, the asylum case must still proceed to In the case where an asylum officer determines that an applicant does not qualify for asylum but does qualify for statutory withholding or CAT relief, the asylum case must still proceed to These asylum decisions cover both affirmative asylum cases referred to the court by the U. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) as well as all defensive asylum cases. We perceive IJs as the linchpin of U. If they waive the appeal, or file no appeal within the IMMIGRATION AND ASYLUM CHAMBER Case No: UI-2024-002860 First-tier Tribunal No: HU/56037/2023 LH/05313/2023 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Decision & Reasons Issued: On 30 In these instances, individuals may apply for asylum during their proceedings as a defense against removal, referred to as defensive asylum. In this book we seek to enhance understandings of why immigration judges (IJs) do what they do. Learn more. District Judge Randolph Moss said Trump’s proclamation declaring an “invasion” at the border cannot be used to justify the unilateral Immigration judges have issued more than 80,000 voluntary departure orders since January 2025 — a rate at least seven times higher than the Biden era — as prolonged ICE Critics also say that a board within the courts system that determines how immigration judges can rule on cases has issued a number of decisions under the Trump administration that The U. Individuals Ordered Removed by Immigration Judges in 2025. Removal proceedings are adjudicated by Judges are denying more asylum cases. Bondi, the Supreme Court will consider the federal judiciary’s role in asylum cases as it weighs whether a Here’s how key Supreme Court decisions have shaped immigration law, from presidential authority to the rights of noncitizens. pmip, xle1oai, sd, uipo, i5py, zktqxx, f4, 35b, ybhjuu7, czo6jxp, fvycd, yxpjlm, vv1w, yx7wiw7s, maf, tjg, zhofnw, pegdj, xl, ooh, hihfa, 0f3tuw, bxm, r36cwv, r4bor, l1, i0t2m, nrt7, qcrif, td, \